Promotion of Innovative Entrepreneurship
Under Sustainable Development
Tatyana Odinokova1
, Mariyana Bozhinova2
, Mariana Petrova3*
1 ISMA University, Riga, Latvia; PhD student at the D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov,
Bulgaria
2 D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria
3 St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Abstract. The subject matter of this article is incentives for innovations in
entrepreneurship. There are two models of entrepreneurship which exist in
developed market economies – traditional and innovative. Innovations
have never been so important as they are now, which holds particularly
true for small and medium-sized businesses. As Peter F.Drucker
formulated it, “Innovation is the specific tool of entrepreneurs, the means
by which they exploit change as an opportunity for a different business or a
different service.” The methods by which innovations are encouraged
change from country to country. The choice of such methods depends on
economic, political and other conditions for a country's development. By
encouraging innovative activities, governments enhance the effectiveness
of innovative systems and create favorable conditions for enterprises to
engage in science and technology. For the EU, which falls behind the USA
and Japan in so far as innovation technologies are concerned, it is a high-
priority task to implement the innovation development strategy and to
transform its economy in accordance with the up-to-date model by 2020.
The aim of such strategy is to achieve industrial leadership as well as to
support business, including small and medium-sized businesses.
1 Introduction
Nowadays, innovative entrepreneurship plays a key role in a nation's economic
development. Economic literature identifies two models of entrepreneurship – a
conventional and an innovative one. The first model suggests entrepreneurship of a
traditional type where the entrepreneur aims to manage their business with a view to get the
highest possible return on the resources. It is widely thought that the concept of production
growth management is formed within the framework of the traditional model, while
production growth management itself relies on external factors, such as funding or
protectionism by the government. At the same time, internal reserves of an enterprise
- Corresponding author: [email protected]
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
E3S Web of Conferences 41, 04015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104015
IIIrd International Innovative Mining Symposium
intended to modernize production, increase profitability and renew the product range, are
put in motion.
2 Ways to Promote Innovative Entrepreneurship
Innovative entrepreneurship suggests a specific type of commercial activity intended to
make profit by creating innovations and proactively marketing them in the national
economy. As opposed to the traditional entrepreneurship, the innovative one relies on
looking for new ways to develop an existing enterprise. Such innovation could involve new
products, technologies, markets, materials, or setting up a pioneering enterprise [1].
The innovation process of the 21st century is radically different to that of the preceding
one. Perhaps the most important difference is the new or renewed importance of new and
small firms. The change can be resumed as a shift from the “Managed Economy” to the
“Entrepreneurial Economy” [2, 3]. In the former, science and systematic large firm R&D
was the key. In the latter, entrepreneurship is one of the foundations of innovation.
The reason why new and small businesses have become key players in the innovation
process has been their ability to identify and exploit business opportunities which emerge as
a result of technological, competitive and market developments.
Besides, large scale economy in R&D is no longer an obstacle for small and medium
size enterprises, as was the case in the past. Nowadays, innovations are normally carried out
in collaboration between universities, research organizations, customers, suppliers, business
rivals and consumers. Such tendency makes it possible to share both the expenses and the
tasks. Concurrently, there has been a massive transition from production to services, which
has led to the emergence of new kinds of non-technological innovation in which small and
medium size enterprises may play a key role.
Throughout the last decade, the EU has been involved in the formation of innovative
policies at three levels, namely, regional, interregional and transnational. The current EU
development strategy “Europe 2020” has adopted five priority targets intended to increase
the employment rate of the population, to implement innovation, to improve the quality of
education, to reduce the risk of poverty and social exclusion and to tackle the problems
related to climate change and the shortage of energy and other resources. In order to meet
these targets, a framework programme called “Horizon 2020” was launched on 1 January,
- There are three priority areas that form the basis for Horizon 2020, namely: (a)
generating an advanced expertise to reinforce Europe's competitiveness among the leading
global nations; (b) industrial leadership and political backing of businesses including small
and medium size businesses and innovation; (c) tackling social problems to meet the
challenges of the contemporary world which were specified in the “Europe 2020” strategy.
These tasks involve the accomplishment of all the stages of the innovative chain, from
research outcome to its commercialization and marketing. That said, not only technological,
but also social innovations are considered [4].
In order to support economically backward economies and regions of Europe, European
programme is planning to provide € 80m, or 25% of the total EU structural funds, in
regional development funds. In 2020, expenses on research and innovation will increase to
8.5% in the total EU budget, compared to 6.7% in 2013 [5, 6].
Creation of start-up businesses as well as implementing innovation in the existing small
and medium size businesses is the key element of the present day innovation process. It
should be the primary focus of the government's strategy to promote innovation. However,
backing of entrepreneurship and small and medium size businesses in particular has not so
far been incorporated in the innovation policy. Moreover, requirements for an effective
2
E3S Web of Conferences 41, 04015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104015
IIIrd International Innovative Mining Symposium
policy in this field are still not quite clear. Start-ups and innovative small and medium size
businesses tend to be considered as agents of change in economy, since they implement
new products and services as well as more effective practices. They help to adapt our
economies and communities to new challenges and spur economic development.
According to European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS), in 2016 Latvia was found the
most dynamic innovator among the EU countries. It had a 4% growth of the effectiveness
of innovation, which was enough to be upgraded to the group of Moderate Innovators. That
said, effectiveness of innovation in Latvia is only 54% of the European average [7]
The latest statistic data have shown that 28.2% of industrial enterprises and 23.4% of
service providing enterprises are active innovators. That said, funding of research and
development in Latvia was reduced in 2016. Indeed, R&D expenses amounted to 0.62% of
the GDP, while in 2016 this figure dropped to 0.44% [8]. There were a number of changes
in the sources of R&D funding in 2016 (Figure 1).
Fig. 1. Sources of R&D Funding in Latvia (%) [8].
The share of government spending rose significantly from 25.6% in 2014 to 47.4% in
2016, which can be considered as the evidence of direct promotion of innovative
enterprises. At the same time, the share of foreign investment fell from 44.2% in 2014 to
27.8% in 2016, while the share of funding by private business - 21.6% in 2016 as opposed
to 27.8% in 2014. Insignificant as the drop may appear, it could imply a pessimistic opinion
of the business community about the prospects of Latvia's economic development.
But to achieve it is necessary to increase funding, for example in general, for EU (28
countries) R&D expenditure share in GDP increased by 16,67 % from 2005 [9].
Enterprises' innovative activities, small and medium size enterprises in particular, rely
on the forms and methods of promotion. Industrially developed economies have
accumulated vast experience in applying direct and indirect methods to promote innovative
activity. Direct methods of promoting innovative activity include: government funding of
projects by providing grants, vouchers, subsidies, as well as by means of venture
investment, soft loans and state procurement. Indirect methods aim to secure private
3
E3S Web of Conferences 41, 04015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104015
IIIrd International Innovative Mining Symposium
investment to the innovative activity. Indirect methods of promoting innovation include:
creation of industrial clusters, business incubators and tax exemptions [10, 11].
Business communities shall recognize that companies’ ability to implement innovations
can be a powerful trigger to competitive advantage and process effectiveness, which are so
important for small companies which have the understanding that research and
development expenses are investments into future development. Methodical basis for this
may be the procedure for determining the value of intellectual property [9].
The methods of direct and indirect promotion of innovative activity in Latvia have been
developed on the basis of international expertise and with consideration of the specific
challenges of the national economy. Consolidated information is represented in Table 1.
Information presented in Table 1 shows that all the methods that are typical of the
majority of the EU countries are applied in Latvia. However, Latvia lags behind the other
countries in so far as innovative activity is concerned. In 2017, Latvia only ranked 33rd,
while its close neighbor Estonia ranked 25th [12].
Creation of technology parks could be used as an example to illustrate this situation.
Latvian Technology Centre (LTC) was set up as far back as 1993. Originally, it was
intended to develop innovative and technologically oriented entities to support small and
medium sized businesses in Latvia. Today however, the number of technology parks in
Latvia is quite insignificant compared to the EU member states. An example would be the
number of technology parks in the Nordic countries – 30 parks in Sweden, 22 in Finland
and 12 in Norway [13]
Research has shown that overall growth of innovative activity has been mostly due to
technological innovations, whereas such activity in the field of marketing and management
has been a lot lower. Such disproportion is particularly visible in big entities, while in small
companies it is less common.
According to the Programme for improvement of the National Innovation System, the
methods of promoting innovative activity in Latvia have had little effect for the following
reasons [14].
Table 1. Methods to promote innovative activities in Latvia [Sources 15, 16].
Direct promotion Aims
Investment in industrial
infrastructure and facilities
Construction, reconstruction or renovation of industrial
facilities to be used by small and medium size enterprises in
the manufacturing and processing industry.
Direct funding (innovation
vouchers)
Intended for small and medium size enterprises involved in
the development of new products and technologies.
Indirect promotion Aims
Centers of competence Support of R&D and innovative activity (elaboration of new
products and technologies) based on specific industrial needs.
Transfer of technology
programmes
Increase in the earnings of scientific entities due to
commercialization of their research funded by the
government, assistance in marketing the results of such
research by converting it into practical entrepreneurship.
Support of innovative
product implementation
Measures to facilitate the increase of efficiency and
competitive edge of enterprises by implementing new
products and technologies and by increasing private
investment in R&D.
4
E3S Web of Conferences 41, 04015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104015
IIIrd International Innovative Mining Symposium
Innovation motivation
programme
Provision of publicity and stimulating the public, young
people in particular, to become entrepreneurs and to
participate in innovative activity.
Staff search support Supplying skilled labour force to entrepreneurs to promote
higher efficiency as well as development and implementation
of new products and technologies.
Competitive edge globally Support of participation in international fairs and exhibitions.
Business incubators Support of viable start-ups with high competitive ability in
Latvian regions by providing business environment,
consultancy services and access to funding.
Clusters Support of export and turnover in a specific industry to
promote specialization and cooperation in the development of
new products or creation of value chain (inter-industrial
cooperation)
Corporative income tax To encourage the purchase of new technological equipment.
Random nature of the streams of expertise and low performance efficiency;
Insufficient innovative resources in Latvia (human capital, technologies, funding).
Moreover such resources are not used in the most efficient way;
Insufficient communication between the entities involved;
Business environment does not encourage innovative processes.
In view of this, economic and socio-economic benefits seem to be insufficient to
support the process, to say nothing of the advantages for the society and the national
economy.
Raising innovative activity of small and medium size businesses is an objective that
provides an opportunity to influence economic growth in a positive way. These companies
have the advantage of a low level of organisational and maintenance costs, the ability to
respond promptly to market demand, while their management proves to be dynamic and
flexible. Due to these factors, small and medium sized enterprises are an efficient tool for
elaboration and implementation of innovative changes.
3 Conclusion
Methods of promoting innovation differ from country to country. Latvian experience has
shown that the choice of such methods depends on economic, political and other conditions
of national development. That said, even though the range of methods for both direct and
indirect promotion is wide, they do not impact the innovative characteristic of the national
economy. In consideration of the foregoing premises, it can be concluded that the methods-
in-use have to be analyzed, the most effective ones have to be identified and a model for
promoting innovative activities has to be elaborated to meet national economic challenges.
Promotion of innovative activity in small and medium size enterprises impact economic
growth in a positive way. Such businesses have a low level of organisational and
maintenance costs, the ability to respond promptly to market demand, they are managed in
a dynamic and flexible way. Due to these factors, small and medium sized enterprises are
an efficient tool for elaboration and implementation of innovative changes.
Innovations spur the competitive edge of business environment, which makes them an
essential prerequisite for national economic development, even more so under the
conditions of the modern global market. In particular, enterprises should aim to use their
5
E3S Web of Conferences 41, 04015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104015
IIIrd International Innovative Mining Symposium
resources and competitive edge to secure investment in innovation. Today, smart business,
which helps enterprises to be competitive both domestically and globally, is driven by
innovative business models as well as by new products, services and development
processes.
References
- V. G. Medinskiy, L. G. Skamay, Innovacionoye predprinimatelstvo (2002)
- R. Turik, Research Paper, 12 (2009)
- D.Audretsch, R.Thurik, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2(2), 143
(2004)
- European Commission (Joint Research Centre. 2013)
- E.Y. Gorbatenko Globalnoye nauchno-tehnicheskoye i innovacionnoye razvitiye
Evropeyskogo soyuza v ramkah programmi “Gorizont 2020” (2013)
- O. A. Sushchenko, I. M. Trunina, D. M. Zagirniak, Modern Electrical and Energy
Systems (MEES), 344 (2017)
- European Innovation Scoreboard (2017)
- Latvijas statistikas gadagrāmata 2017 (2018)
- S.V. Labunska, M. Petrova, O. Prokopishyna,. Economic Annals, 165(5-6) 13 (2017)
- OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2011)
- OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2011)
- Globalniy innovacionniy indeks (2017)
- Evrostate (2017)
- Program for improvement of the National Innovation System (2016)
- Supporting innovations and business in Latvia State Aid Financial instruments 2014-
2020 (2017)
- Support Measures for Innovations and SMEs (2016)
- O. A. Sushchenko, I. M. Actual Probl Econ 177(3) 191 (2016)
- Kristina Balkienė, Jonas Jagminas, Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 34, 32 (2010)