لخّصلي

Furthermore, confidence in the acquisition of knowledge slightly differed between the two batches.These findings question the fact that traditional examinations, as the sole indicator of a student's academic proficiency, are sufficient to accurately determine a student's readiness for university.In this way, CAGs are likely to provide a better insight into a student's proficiency and knowledge; they can be considered as an alternative to traditional final examinations.

Furthermore, confidence in the acquisition of knowledge slightly differed between the two batches. Despite the vague observation of doubtfulness and lack of certainty in the answers of the 2020 batch, this lack of certainty could be due to various factors faced by the students of 2020, which were not present in the batch of 2019. It is safe to assume that the sudden change in learning methods, as well as the brand-new experience of the absence of exams are considered as important arguments in favour of the 2020 batch. These findings question the fact that traditional examinations, as the sole indicator of a student's academic proficiency, are sufficient to accurately determine a student's readiness for university. In this way, CAGs are likely to provide a better insight into a student's proficiency and knowledge; they can be considered as an alternative to traditional final examinations.