لخّصلي

خدمة تلخيص النصوص العربية أونلاين،قم بتلخيص نصوصك بضغطة واحدة من خلال هذه الخدمة

نتيجة التلخيص (50%)

The mean distance at which the pedestrian was first recog- nised was analysed using a three-way linear mixed effects model with the factors of Age (with two levels: Young and Old), distracters (with three levels: None, Visual and Audi- tory) and Clothing (with two levels: Vest and Biomotion),

Night-time pedestrian recognition with subjects as a random factor, and condition order as a continuous covariate.An analysis of the visual predictors of the mean distance at which pedestrians were first recognised (after collapsing across the clothing and distracter variables), revealed that visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and motion sensitivity were all significant bivariate predictors, as was the UFOV test 3 (selective attention; see Table 2).The mean letter contrast sensitivity and motion sen- sitivity were also significantly worse for the older group, but differences in performance on the UFOV were signifi- cantly slower only for the selective attention subtest, but not for visual processing speed or divided attention sub- tests.To examine which of the visual func- tion measures best predicted the overall mean recognition distance for each participant, Pearson bivariate correlations and Pearson partial correlations (controlling for driver age) were conducted.Response distances were also affected by the presence or absence of distracters (F2,29.56 = 5.254, p = 0.011) such that the visual distracter condition resulted in significantly shorter recognition distances than the audio distracter condition (189.7 vs 219.39 m) but the audio and baseline conditions (207.71 m) did not differ significantly.To determine whether the relationship between the visual measures and pedestrian recognition distance were driven purely by ageing, partial correlations were also con- ducted with age as a covariate (Table 2).All data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance, and multivariate tests of sig- nificance were employed to rule out problems associated with sphericity.The partial


النص الأصلي

The mean distance at which the pedestrian was first recog- nised was analysed using a three-way linear mixed effects model with the factors of Age (with two levels: Young and Old), distracters (with three levels: None, Visual and Audi- tory) and Clothing (with two levels: Vest and Biomotion),


Night-time pedestrian recognition
with subjects as a random factor, and condition order as a continuous covariate. To examine which of the visual func- tion measures best predicted the overall mean recognition distance for each participant, Pearson bivariate correlations and Pearson partial correlations (controlling for driver age) were conducted. All data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance, and multivariate tests of sig- nificance were employed to rule out problems associated with sphericity.
Results
Table 1 presents the mean visual function data for the younger and older participants. Although the mean visual acuity for the older group was slightly better than 6/6, it was significantly worse than the mean acuity of the younger group. The mean letter contrast sensitivity and motion sen- sitivity were also significantly worse for the older group, but differences in performance on the UFOV were signifi- cantly slower only for the selective attention subtest, but not for visual processing speed or divided attention sub- tests.
Figure 1 shows the mean pedestrian recognition distances as a function of age group and pedestrian clothing. The mean distance at which the drivers first recognised that a pedestrian was present was 190.3 m col- lapsed across all drivers, pedestrian clothing and distracter conditions. Overall, the older participants recognised the pedestrians at significantly shorter distances than did the younger participants F1,30 = 33.4, p < 0.001; with the older participants recognising pedestrians at approximately half the distance of the younger participants (129.1 m vs 251.5 m).
The clothing manipulation had a significant effect on pedestrian recognition distance (F1,30.95 = 105.77,
Table 1. Mean (and standard deviation) scores on tests of visual perfor- mance for the younger and older participants
p < 0.001). When averaged across driver age and distracter conditions, drivers responded to the pedestrian wearing biomotion clothing at a mean distance (249.0 m) that was almost twice as long as that of the standard vest alone (131.7 m). Response distances were also affected by the presence or absence of distracters (F2,29.56 = 5.254, p = 0.011) such that the visual distracter condition resulted in significantly shorter recognition distances than the audio distracter condition (189.7 vs 219.39 m) but the audio and baseline conditions (207.71 m) did not differ significantly. There was no significant age 9 distracter (F2,29.62 = 0.16; p = 0.86) interaction. The interaction between clothing and distracters (F2,29.68 = 0.46; p = 0.64), and the three- way interaction between clothes, distracters and age (F2,29.64 = 0.03; p = 0.97) were also non-significant. There was however a significant two-way interaction between clothing and age F1,30.04 = 6.30, p = 0.02 (see Figure 1). Although for both groups, the biomotion clothing configu- ration was visible at a longer distance than the vest, this effect was stronger for the younger participants.
An analysis of the visual predictors of the mean distance at which pedestrians were first recognised (after collapsing across the clothing and distracter variables), revealed that visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and motion sensitivity were all significant bivariate predictors, as was the UFOV test 3 (selective attention; see Table 2). In each case, drivers with better visual sensitivity (or faster UFOV response times) tended to recognise the pedestrians at longer dis- tances. The relationship between motion sensitivity and overall pedestrian recognition distance for both age groups is shown in Figure 2.
To determine whether the relationship between the visual measures and pedestrian recognition distance were driven purely by ageing, partial correlations were also con- ducted with age as a covariate (Table 2). The partial


تلخيص النصوص العربية والإنجليزية أونلاين

تلخيص النصوص آلياً

تلخيص النصوص العربية والإنجليزية اليا باستخدام الخوارزميات الإحصائية وترتيب وأهمية الجمل في النص

تحميل التلخيص

يمكنك تحميل ناتج التلخيص بأكثر من صيغة متوفرة مثل PDF أو ملفات Word أو حتي نصوص عادية

رابط دائم

يمكنك مشاركة رابط التلخيص بسهولة حيث يحتفظ الموقع بالتلخيص لإمكانية الإطلاع عليه في أي وقت ومن أي جهاز ماعدا الملخصات الخاصة

مميزات أخري

نعمل علي العديد من الإضافات والمميزات لتسهيل عملية التلخيص وتحسينها


آخر التلخيصات

بدينا تخزينتنا ...

بدينا تخزينتنا ولم تفارقني الرغبة بان اكون بين يدي رجلين اثنين أتجرأ على عضويهما المنتصبين يتبادلاني...

خليج العقبة هو ...

خليج العقبة هو الفرع الشرقي للبحر الأحمر المحصور شرق شبه جزيرة سيناء وغرب شبه الجزيرة العربية، وبالإ...

فرضية كفاءة الس...

فرضية كفاءة السوق تعتبر فرضية السوق الكفء او فرضية كفاءة السوق بمثابة الدعامة او العمود الفقري للنظر...

‏@Moamen Azmy -...

‏@Moamen Azmy - مؤمن عزمي:موقع هيلخصلك اي مادة لينك تحويل الفيديو لنص https://notegpt.io/youtube-tra...

انا احبك جداً ت...

انا احبك جداً تناول البحث أهمية الإضاءة الطبيعية كأحد المفاهيم الجوهرية في التصميم المعماري، لما لها...

توفير منزل آمن ...

توفير منزل آمن ونظيف ويدعم الطفل عاطفيًا. التأكد من حصول الأطفال على الرعاية الطبية والتعليمية والن...

Le pêcheur et s...

Le pêcheur et sa femme Il y avait une fois un pêcheur et sa femme, qui habitaient ensemble une cahu...

في التاسع من ما...

في التاسع من مايو/أيار عام 1960، وافقت إدارة الغذاء والدواء الأمريكية على الاستخدام التجاري لأول أقر...

أهم نقاط الـ Br...

أهم نقاط الـ Breaker Block 🔹 ما هو الـ Breaker Block؟ • هو Order Block حقيقي يكون مع الاتجاه الرئي...

دوري كمدرب و مس...

دوري كمدرب و مسؤولة عن المجندات ، لا اكتفي باعطاء الأوامر، بل اعدني قدوة في الانضباط والالتزام .فالم...

سادساً: التنسيق...

سادساً: التنسيق مع الهيئة العامة للزراعة والثروة السمكية وفريق إدارة شؤون البيئة لنقل أشجار المشلع ب...

I tried to call...

I tried to call the hospital , it was too early in the morning because I knew I will be late for ...