خدمة تلخيص النصوص العربية أونلاين،قم بتلخيص نصوصك بضغطة واحدة من خلال هذه الخدمة
The presence of a population who spoke Proto-Armenian in Urartu prior to its demise is subject to speculation, but the existence of Urartian words in the Armenian language and Armenian loanwords into Urartian suggests early contact between the two languages and long periods of bilingualism.Furthermore, over 250 years of usage, it shows no development, which is taken to indicate that the language had ceased to be spoken before the time of the inscriptions or was used only for official purposes.[better source needed]
A complementary theory, suggested by Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze and Ivanov in 1984, places the Proto-Indo-European homeland (the location where Indo-European would have emerged from) in the Armenian Highlands, which would entail the presence of proto-Armenians in the area during the entire lifetime of the Urartian state.[103] Although this theory has less support than the more popular Kurgan hypothesis, the Armenian hypothesis would support the theory that the Urartian language was not spoken, but simply written, and postulates that the Armenian language was an in situ development of a 3rd millennium BC Proto-Indo-European languageUntil recently, it was generally assumed that Proto-Armenian speakers entered Anatolia around 1200 BC, during the Bronze Age Collapse, which was three to four centuries before the emergence of the Kingdom of Van.
The presence of a population who spoke Proto-Armenian in Urartu prior to its demise is subject to speculation, but the existence of Urartian words in the Armenian language and Armenian loanwords into Urartian suggests early contact between the two languages and long periods of bilingualism. The presence of toponyms, tribal names, and deities of probable Proto-Armenian etymologies which are attested in records left by Urartian kings, such as Uelikuni, Uduri-Etiuni, Abiliani, and Arzashkun, the personal names Arame and Diaṣuni, and the deities Arṣibedini and Aniqu, further supports the presence of an Armenian speaking population in at least the northern regions of Urartu. Until recently, it was generally assumed that Proto-Armenian speakers entered Anatolia around 1200 BC, during the Bronze Age Collapse, which was three to four centuries before the emergence of the Kingdom of Van. However, recent genetic research suggests that the Armenian ethnogenesis was completed by 1200 BC, making the arrival of an Armenian-speaking population as late as the Bronze Age Collapse unlikely.[102] Regardless, the Urartian confederation united the disparate peoples of the highlands, which began a process of intermingling of the peoples and cultures (probably including Armenian tribes) and languages (probably including Proto-Armenian) within the highlands. This intermixing would ultimately culminate in the emergence of the Armenian language as the dominant language within the region.
A theory, supported by the official historiography of Armenia and experts in Assyrian and Urartian studies such as Igor M. Diakonoff, Giorgi Melikishvili, Mikhail Nikolsky, and Ivan Mestchaninov, suggests that Urartian was solely the formal written language of the state, while its inhabitants, including the royal family, spoke Proto-Armenian. This theory primarily hinges on the fact that the Urartian language used in the cuneiform inscriptions were very repetitive and scant in vocabulary (having as little as 350–400 roots). Furthermore, over 250 years of usage, it shows no development, which is taken to indicate that the language had ceased to be spoken before the time of the inscriptions or was used only for official purposes.[better source needed]
A complementary theory, suggested by Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze and Ivanov in 1984, places the Proto-Indo-European homeland (the location where Indo-European would have emerged from) in the Armenian Highlands, which would entail the presence of proto-Armenians in the area during the entire lifetime of the Urartian state.[103] Although this theory has less support than the more popular Kurgan hypothesis, the Armenian hypothesis would support the theory that the Urartian language was not spoken, but simply written, and postulates that the Armenian language was an in situ development of a 3rd millennium BC Proto-Indo-European language
تلخيص النصوص العربية والإنجليزية اليا باستخدام الخوارزميات الإحصائية وترتيب وأهمية الجمل في النص
يمكنك تحميل ناتج التلخيص بأكثر من صيغة متوفرة مثل PDF أو ملفات Word أو حتي نصوص عادية
يمكنك مشاركة رابط التلخيص بسهولة حيث يحتفظ الموقع بالتلخيص لإمكانية الإطلاع عليه في أي وقت ومن أي جهاز ماعدا الملخصات الخاصة
نعمل علي العديد من الإضافات والمميزات لتسهيل عملية التلخيص وتحسينها
عام. يمكن القول إن نظام المعلومات يعزز شفافية السوق من خلال توفير المعلومات اللازمة ويعزز تداولية ال...
In this presentation, I will focus on main points: First, I will provide a definition of the concep...
في خسائر فادحة للذرة، والمحاصيل السكرية، والأعلاف النجيلية، والكينوا. لمواجهة هذه التحديات بفعالية،...
أدى الإنترنت والتطور الرقمي إلى إحداث تحول جذري في أساليب التواصل وتبادل المعلومات بين الأفراد. فنحن...
تم في هذا المشروع تطبيق مكونات الواجهة الأمامية (Front-end) والواجهة الخلفية (Back-end) الشائعة لضما...
تُعد عدالة الأحداث من أهم القضايا التي تشغل الأنظمة القانونية والاجتماعية في مختلف دول العالم، نظرًا...
كان تحالف ديلوس في البداية قوة دفاعية ناجحة، لكنه تحول مع الوقت إلى أداة للسيطرة الأثينية، مما أدى إ...
--- ### **التعريف:** عوائق التعلم التنظيمي هي **عوائق إدراكية، أو ثقافية، أو هيكلية، أو شخصية** تم...
أولا شعر الحزب الزبيري بدا يتنصيب عبد الله بن الزبير نفسه خليفة على الحجاز، واستمر تسع سنوات، وانته...
ث- الصراع: يعتبر من المفاهيم الأقرب لمفهوم الأزمة، حيث أن العديد من الأزمات تنبع من صراع بين طرفين...
تعرض مواطن يدعى عادل مقلي لاعتداء عنيف من قبل عناصر مسلحة تابعة لمليشيا الحوثي أمام زوجته، في محافظة...
زيادة الحوافز والدعم المالي للأسر الحاضنة لتشجيع المشاركة. تحسين تدريب ومراقبة العاملين الاجتماعيين...