Online English Summarizer tool, free and accurate!
The Rule of the Democratic
Party, 1950-60
The new assembly and the new cabinet
There is widespread consensus among historians that the Democratic
Party's landslide election victory in May 1950 is a watershed in modern
Turkish political history.There was more competition for the post of
prime minister, but the post went to Adnan Menderes, who was backed
by Bayar because of his popular appeal.Over the years, therefore, state and party tended to coalesce again, especially at the higher levels, but the difference from
the Kemalist era was that the party dominated the bureaucracy, not the
other way around.The most striking difference from the
RPP was the virtual absence of representatives with a bureaucratic and/
or military background.It was clear that a significantly different section
of Turkey's elite had come to power.1
One of the first things the new assembly did was to elect Celal Bayar
president of the republic.There was very little debate about his candidature:
he was the founder of the new party, he had a record as a
statesman going back to the days of Ataturk and he was widely
regarded as a moderate.Under the RPP the state apparatus and the party machine had been
merged (even officially) to the extent that one could say that the party
was just one of the instruments through which the state controlled and
steered society. The character both of the new assembly, in
which the DP held an overwhelming majority (408 seats against the
RPP's 69), and of the new government was very different from the old.When one looks at the social characteristics of the DP representatives,
one is struck by a number of differences from those of the
Kemalist period.The DP representatives were on average younger,
more often had local roots in their constituencies, were less likely to
have had a university education, and far more likely to have a background
in commerce or in law.
The Rule of the Democratic
Party, 1950–60
The new assembly and the new cabinet
There is widespread consensus among historians that the Democratic
Party’s landslide election victory in May 1950 is a watershed in modern
Turkish political history. The character both of the new assembly, in
which the DP held an overwhelming majority (408 seats against the
RPP’s 69), and of the new government was very different from the old.
When one looks at the social characteristics of the DP representatives,
one is struck by a number of differences from those of the
Kemalist period. The DP representatives were on average younger,
more often had local roots in their constituencies, were less likely to
have had a university education, and far more likely to have a background
in commerce or in law. The most striking difference from the
RPP was the virtual absence of representatives with a bureaucratic and/
or military background. It was clear that a significantly different section
of Turkey’s elite had come to power.1
One of the first things the new assembly did was to elect Celâl Bayar
president of the republic. There was very little debate about his candidature:
he was the founder of the new party, he had a record as a
statesman going back to the days of Atatürk and he was widely
regarded as a moderate. There was more competition for the post of
prime minister, but the post went to Adnan Menderes, who was backed
by Bayar because of his popular appeal. Menderes became not only
prime minister but also party chairman, a position the president had
always held under the RPP.
Under the RPP the state apparatus and the party machine had been
merged (even officially) to the extent that one could say that the party
was just one of the instruments through which the state controlled and
steered society. When the DP came to power the link was broken. The
Democrats mistrusted the bureaucracy and the military they inherited
from the old regime, and devoted a great deal of effort to getting them
under their control. Over the years, therefore, state and party tended to coalesce again, especially at the higher levels, but the difference from
the Kemalist era was that the party dominated the bureaucracy, not the
other way around.
Summarize English and Arabic text using the statistical algorithm and sorting sentences based on its importance
You can download the summary result with one of any available formats such as PDF,DOCX and TXT
ٌYou can share the summary link easily, we keep the summary on the website for future reference,except for private summaries.
We are working on adding new features to make summarization more easy and accurate
وقد تعزى هذه النتيجة الى مقدرة المدير على تكوين فريق العمل وتوزيع المهمات بينهم وقد تعزى هذه النتيجة...
تحديات تنفيذ متغيرات السياسة النقدية في العراق: بالرغم من محاولات البنك المركزي العراقي لتقديم المسا...
Introductiongénérale La plateforme est une structuremécanique dotée d’une motorisation. Etant la fo...
The 140-Character Conversation: Mastering Twitter for Modern Marketing In the ever-evolving landscap...
المطلب الأول: مفهوم الجيوبوليتيك والجغرافية السياسية يرجع تعبير الى العالم الألماني كانت (1724) 1804...
accidental or deliberate overload without also compromising network performance. The provision of si...
والنظرة إلى (الاستِشراق التنصيري) لا تُبنَى من كثير بحث؛ فهم عَلَمٌ بين أولئك؛ ذلك أنَّ فِئامًا منهم...
فيليبو برونيليسكي هو فنان إيطالي شهير وازدهرت حياته في القرن السابع عشر. إليك ملخصًا لحياته: النشأة...
some kind of modification(s) of the genome/DNA of the host organism, hence the term of genetically m...
و المنهج الذي يتناول العمل األدبي من بدايت ه إلى نموه واكتماله من حيث الكشف عن العناصر الشعوري ة، و...
▪ We assessed the susceptibility of Shell’s Consolidated Financial Statements to material misstatem...
تلعب الدولة دورًا حاسمًا في مواجهة التضخم من خلال السياسات النقدية والمالية. فعلى صعيد السياسة النقد...