لخّصلي

Table of Contents
Foreword
A. Decreased performance of railway junction Stuttgart
p.1
A1: Promised service unachievable p.1 A2: Performance dismantling p.3 A3: Decommissioning the existing trackage still unsettled p.3 A4.Lack of timetable robustness in case of disruptions p.3 A4.1: When the tunnels are closed, not all tracks can be used p.3 A4.2: No alternative for S-Bahn trains p.3
B. Reduced safety
B1: Sixfold canted track gradient p.3 B2: Inadequate fire protection p.3
B3: Limitations and lack of escape routes for disabled people B4: Narrow platforms and accesses
C. Building risks
C1: Risk of swelling anhydrite / building damage due to uplift C2: Unsafe underground / risk of floating
C3: Danger of sinkholes and landslides
C4: Risk of ground water and mineral water
D. Incalculable cost risks
D1: Multiplied construction costs / cost obfuscation D2: Operating profitability of Stuttgart21 unachievable D3: Breach of efficiency principle and Group Policy D4: Delay costs
p.4 p.4
p.5 p.5 p.5 p.5
p.6 p.6 p.6 p.6
E. Unresolved airport and S-Bahn train connections / traffic problems with
public transport
E1: Mixed traffic and one-track route Filderstadt
E2: Ministerial permission to use S-Bahn tunnel for passenger trains
E3: S-Bahn and city railway operating through S-21 impaired over the years E4: Problems during trial operation and commissioning
F. Contractual and implementation issues
F1: Construction time overruns - completion delayed by years F2: Plan approvals are not completed
G. Environment and climate threatened by S-21
G1: Increased energy expenditure and significant CO2 release with S-21 G2: Inner city recreation areas destroyed by S-21
G3: Increased risk of inner city flooding by S-21
A. Decreased performance of the railway junction Stuttgart
A1: Promised service unachievable
p.7 p.7 p.7 p.7
p.7 p.7
p.8 p.8 p.8
o Statement of the Deutsche Bahn (DB) 1996: double the performance of S21 relative to the terminus stati- on
o Arbitration 2010: 50% increase in performance was promised.o Today we know: 40% performance reduction (!) compared to the terminus station, no reserves for the S-Bahn, in peak hours chaos is inevitable.This statement was even included in the application for funding by the European Commission and was the official announce- ment at the time of the loan contract (2009), mediation (2010), and the referendum (2011).In 2013, these untenable promises were implicitly withdrawn.o The project Stuttgart 21 was advertised for many years with double performance.