لخّصلي

Brussels incensed as US spurns global trade rules( yet again)
Europe reacts after Washington’s rearmost swipe against the World Trade Organization for ruling against Trump- period sword and aluminum tariffs.
Brussels is fuming at Washington’s rearmost personality against the World Trade Organization as a forum to resolve trade fights.
Trade Representative Katherine Tai lashed out at the transnational trade body Monday for ruling against formerU.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on sword and aluminum significances. She said that the WTO is walking on “ veritably, veritably thin ice ” when it judged that a republic like theU.S. did n’t have solid public security reasons for assessing tariffs on essence coming from China, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey.
It's another sign that what is left of internationally honored trade rules are eroding as geopolitical pressures run grandly between theU.S., China and the EU, European lawgivers and experts say.
“ The USA’s response of simply rejecting the ruling is incomprehensible, ” said Bernd Lange, who chairs the European Parliament's transnational trade commission. “ We've to have an honest discussion with theU.S.However, and if and how we can deliver the being system," said Lange, if they're moving down from a rules- grounded trading system.
Washington also slighted analogous tariffs on EU directors, but the two sides struck a partial armistice back in 2021.
For the Europeans, Tai’s commentary add personality to times of injury. Tai who represents the country that single- handedly tore down the WTO’s Appellate Body in 2019 under Trump and has refused to restore it ever since — said that the ruling “ really challenges the integrity of the system. ”
She also criticized the decision on “ unelected, not really responsible decision- makers in Geneva( who) alternate conjecture ” America’s public security judgment.
Brussels had hoped that Washington’s bullying of the WTO would come to an end when President Joe Biden, a Democrat, stepped into the White House in January last time. But that did n’t be The Biden administration also questions the applicability of the multinational trade forum because of its systemic contest with China, which is also a WTO member.
Post-WTO reality
“ A lot of people in Europe and Geneva have fully misknew. that the United States have formerly moved on — they're formerly in apost-WTO reality, ” said Hosuk Lee- Makiyama from the Brussels- grounded profitable think tank ECIPE. He cites as proof Biden’s multibillion incitement package for Americans to buy green technology that’s made in theU.S., which experts agree violates WTO rules.
But by now, EU trade diplomats are n’t that surprised at Tai’s fustian statement, and some indeed suppose that she has a point when she says the WTO should n’t be judging what's or is n’t a public security concern.
“ I do not know if we need to depict it too much, ” one EU diplomat said. Another said that Washington has always questioned the validity of court opinions taken outside theU.S., so this is no different.
What’s certain however is that theU.S. and other countries ’ use of the public security exception is tearing at the seams of rules- grounded trade.
still, also this exception becomes the rule, ” said Luisa Santos from the assiduity group BusinessEurope, “ If everyone starts using' public security reasons' to cover profitable interests. “ A country’s transnational commitments come pointless and trade relatively uncertain. ”
Tai’s disparaging commentary about the recent ruling do n’t forebode well either for ongoing conversations in Geneva about how to reform the WTO.
“ I do not see how theU.S. can be serious about maintaining the institution if it isn't prepared to support the one medium that's designed to make sure that everybody plays by the rules, ” said Lorand Bartels, an transnational law professor at the University of Cambridge. “ I suppose that theU.S. slightly cares about the WTO. ”
Camille Gijs, Barbara Moens and Doug Palmer contributed reporting.