لخّصلي

#3 Introduction:

1_Is the problem stated unambiguously and is it easy to identify?no. The problem was not specifically mentioned, but clinical electronic experiments were presented through which nursing students are taught how to deal with children by inserting a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).Through the fifty-eight students who participated in the research, the pilot number was sufficient to view the results of the research and benefit from them, reduce risks, and enable the student to work with a peripherally inserted central catheter and become more advanced, understanding, and practically proficient when practicing it on the ground.4_2 Was the quantitative approach appropriate?Yes.Yes.Yes.

#3 Introduction:

1_Is the problem stated unambiguously and is it easy to identify?
no. The problem was not specifically mentioned, but clinical electronic experiments were presented through which nursing students are taught how to deal with children by inserting a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).

It is possible to identify the problem and work to avoid it

2_Is the problem big for nursing?

It is not considered a major problem, but it reduces the damage. It is likely to be said that it will cause significant damage. Through the idea of ​​the research, the nursing student will be able to understand theoretically and clinically and reduce the dangers through electronic error within electronic training and not in real practice and causing harm to the child.

3_Does the problem statement constitute a convincing argument for the new study?
Yes. Through working with this research experience, the nursing student will be able to work with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).

4_1 Was there a correspondence between the two research problems and the methods used?

Yes. Work was done to design a clinical environment similar to reality (the method used) so that the student can keep up with reality, and when the student makes a mistake within this experiment, the reaction will be identical to the reaction to reality (the problem).

4_2 Was the quantitative approach appropriate?

Yes. Through the fifty-eight students who participated in the research, the pilot number was sufficient to view the results of the research and benefit from them, reduce risks, and enable the student to work with a peripherally inserted central catheter and become more advanced, understanding, and practically proficient when practicing it on the ground.