Online English Summarizer tool, free and accurate!
Michele Trasilla # 77
http://www.jmde.com/ Theorists' Theories of Evaluation
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, Volume 6, Number 13
ISSN 1556-8180
February 2010
209
Theorists' Theories of Evaluation: A
Conversation with Jennifer Greene
Michele Tarsilla
Western Michigan University
Background: Evaluation is sometimes viewed as
a professional practice rather than a discipline
corresponding to a well defined set of theories.Such theoretical categories
would be especially beneficial in that they will
provide some common ground of understanding
among both practitioners and scholars on
evaluation concepts and practices which
experience has shown to be in constant evolution.Such theoretical categories
would be especially beneficial in that they will
provide some common ground of understanding
among both practitioners and scholars on
evaluation concepts and practices which
experience has shown to be in constant evolution.http://www.jmde.com/ Theorists' Theories of Evaluation
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, Volume 6, Number 13
ISSN 1556-8180
February 2010
209
Theorists' Theories of Evaluation: A
Conversation with Jennifer Greene
Michele Tarsilla
Western Michigan University
Background: Evaluation is sometimes viewed as
a professional practice rather than a discipline
corresponding to a well defined set of theories.In particular, the
authors identified five main elements for
evaluation theory and described the contribution
made to each of them by seven of the most
influential scholars in the field over the last five
decades.For this
purpose, the author recommends that the five
main theories applied by this article to examine
Jennifer Greene's work should be used more
systematically in the future to describe and analyze
evaluators' practice.In particular, the
authors identified five main elements for
evaluation theory and described the contribution
made to each of them by seven of the most
influential scholars in the field over the last five
decades.For this
purpose, the author recommends that the five
main theories applied by this article to examine
Jennifer Greene's work should be used more
systematically in the future to describe and analyze
evaluators' practice.For the sake of accuracy, the text of the
interview and the corresponding analysis were
submitted to Greene for review prior to
publication.Second, as knowledge is mediated by
evaluators' perceptual frames, Greene believes that
an unfiltered (objective) view of the world is not
feasible.Fifth, Greene declares that
advocacy in evaluation is inevitable and, as a
result, evaluators should play a socially
enfranchising role today.For the sake of accuracy, the text of the
interview and the corresponding analysis were
submitted to Greene for review prior to
publication.Second, as knowledge is mediated by
evaluators' perceptual frames, Greene believes that
an unfiltered (objective) view of the world is not
feasible.Fifth, Greene declares that
advocacy in evaluation is inevitable and, as a
result, evaluators should play a socially
enfranchising role today.However, Shadish, Cook and Leviton (1991) were
able to demonstrate that evaluators' work does
have theoretical foundations.Keywords: evaluation theory, valuing, social
programming, knowledge, practice, use
__________________________________
*209-219.
Michele Trasilla # 77
http://www.jmde.com/ Theorists’ Theories of Evaluation
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, Volume 6, Number 13
ISSN 1556-8180
February 2010
209
Theorists’ Theories of Evaluation: A
Conversation with Jennifer Greene
Michele Tarsilla
Western Michigan University
Background: Evaluation is sometimes viewed as
a professional practice rather than a discipline
corresponding to a well defined set of theories.
However, Shadish, Cook and Leviton (1991) were
able to demonstrate that evaluators’ work does
have theoretical foundations. In particular, the
authors identified five main elements for
evaluation theory and described the contribution
made to each of them by seven of the most
influential scholars in the field over the last five
decades.
Purpose: This paper intends to further the
discussion on evaluation theory, by examining
some of the contributions made Jennifer Greene,
one of the most influential figures in contemporary
evaluation. The paper mainly focuses on Greene’s
innovative ideas on each of the five main elements
of evaluation theory.
Setting: Not applicable.
Subjects: Not applicable.
Research Design: Not applicable.
Data Collection and Analysis: The paper is the
result of both a desk review of Jennifer Greene’s
most relevant work on bias, objectivity, and
advocacy in evaluation, and a phone interview
with her. For the sake of accuracy, the text of the
interview and the corresponding analysis were
submitted to Greene for review prior to
publication.
Findings: The author shows how Greene has
incorporated the five principles into her own work
and how this eventually influenced her practice.
Greene sorts evaluation approaches based on the
interests they serve and the values they promote.
However, she seems to have developed her theory
on valuing further over the years and today she
claims that evaluators should never privilege
anyone’s specific side in the course of their
assignments. Second, as knowledge is mediated by
evaluators’ perceptual frames, Greene believes that
an unfiltered (objective) view of the world is not
feasible. Third, she views evaluation as a force for
democratizing public conversations about
important issues. Fourth, although the evaluator’s
relationship with program staff could be collegial,
Greene believes that evaluators have no authority
or responsibility for the program design and
implementation. Fifth, Greene declares that
advocacy in evaluation is inevitable and, as a
result, evaluators should play a socially
enfranchising role today.
Conclusions: The debate on evaluation’s main
theoretical foundations is still relevant. For this
purpose, the author recommends that the five
main theories applied by this article to examine
Jennifer Greene’s work should be used more
systematically in the future to describe and analyze
evaluators’ practice. Such theoretical categories
would be especially beneficial in that they will
provide some common ground of understanding
among both practitioners and scholars on
evaluation concepts and practices which
experience has shown to be in constant evolution.
Keywords: evaluation theory, valuing, social
programming, knowledge, practice, use
Summarize English and Arabic text using the statistical algorithm and sorting sentences based on its importance
You can download the summary result with one of any available formats such as PDF,DOCX and TXT
ٌYou can share the summary link easily, we keep the summary on the website for future reference,except for private summaries.
We are working on adding new features to make summarization more easy and accurate
شكالية: الإ ممارسة السياحة الداخلية من أهم النشاطات التي عرفها الإنسان منذ القدم وبالتحديد السياحة ا...
بعد ثماني عشرة سنة من الحرب والمقاومة كان الفرنسيون قد احتلوا الساحل ومعظم المدن الداخلية باستثناء م...
تلعب العلاقات بصفة عامة دورا مهما في الحیاة الاجتماعیة للإنسان كونه کائن اجتماعي لا یمكنه الانعزال ...
لحد من التجريم. الفرع األول تعريف الحد من التجريم القول بأن الحد من التجريم يؤدي إلى إلغاء تجريم الس...
وبذلك يعتمد التفاعل بين البشر وأنظمة الكمبيوتر على اللغة الطبيعية، ، وعادة ما يتم بدء المحادثة النصي...
إننامعتادونجميًعاعلىرؤيةالأعدادمكتوبة،وعلىاستقاءمعنًىمنها.معذلكفالرقم6 والعدد الذي يمثله الرقم ليسا ...
اللغة تعبر عن تكييف أهلها الخاص لكثير من الأشياء المادية والمعنوية التكييف هو جعل كيفية للشيء أى حال...
توم سوير رواية كلاسيكية في الأدب الأمريكي تعود لعام 1876 من تأليف الكتاب مارك توين واسمه الحقيقي صمو...
Nanotechnology is the study of particles of sizes ranging from 1 to 100 nm, including their manufact...
This project was created to identify the changes that occur in self-concept and body image during ad...
Pratique Neurologique – FMC 2016;7:256–265 Pour la pratique L'intervention orthophonique dans la ma...
تعتمد إدارة المؤسسات على المعلومات المحاسبية في اتخاذ القرارات وحتى يمكن الحصول على معلومات محاسبية ...